Embodied Mind in Place: A Study of the Relationship Between Mind, Body, and Urban Environment.

Mehdilou, Sevil; Dolatabadi, Fariborz; Yaghoobi, Masoomeh

doi:10.48311/UDD.5.4.67

Embodied Mind in Place: A Study of the Relationship Between Mind, Body, and Urban Environment.

Document Type : Qualitative Research

Authors

S. Mehdilou ¹

F. Dolatabadi ²

M. Yaghoobi ³

¹ A Ph.D. student of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Tehran West Branch, Tehran, Iran.

² Assistant Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad University,Tehran West Branch, Tehran, Iran.

³ Assistant Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil Branch, Ardabil, Iran

https://doi.org/10.48311/UDD.5.4.67

Abstract

Problem Statement: How does place, beyond being a physical space, influence the formation of human identity, cognition, and experience? This article aims to explore this fundamental question by explaining the complex interaction between humans and the built environment.

Objective: To present a comprehensive model of the human sensory-motor experience and the creation of effective non-verbal communication with the environment, in order to facilitate the design of higher-quality and more humane spaces.

Methodology: Relying on a descriptive-analytical approach and an in-depth review of the literature, this article seeks to explain the hidden patterns between space, experience, and meaning. Qualitative text analysis has been a key tool in achieving this goal.

Findings: Place is not merely a physical setting but a meaningful context in which individual and collective identities are formed. Spatial symbols and visual elements, as a common language, enable communication with the environment and the creation of meaning. The human mind is strongly influenced by spatial structures, and spaces can affect perception, emotions, and behaviors.

Conclusion: With a deep understanding of the relationship between humans and place, we can design spaces that not only meet the physical needs of humans but also improve the quality of life, strengthen a sense of belonging, and shape collective identity. Mind, body, and environment are inextricably linked, and understanding this complex relationship is essential for creating sustainable and dynamic human environments. The presented model can be used as a tool for designers and urban planners.

Keywords

Place

Identity

mind

Body

urban environment

Symbol

space

Nonverbal communication

Subjects

Culture and Identity in the City

Ara, R. (2006). Wittgenstein’s concept of language games. Al-Hikmat: A Journal of Philosophy, 26, 47–62.
Ardalan, N., & Bakhtiar, l. (2011). The Sense of Unity: The Sufi Tradition in Persian Architecture. (V. Jalili, Trans.). Elme Memar.
Baggio, G. (2018). George Herbert Mead, Mind Self & Society. The Definitive Edition. Edited by Charles W. Morris. Annoted Edition by Daniel R. Huebner and Hans Joas, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London 2015. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 10(X-2).
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307–337.
Beauvoir, S. de. (2014). The second sex. In Classic and Contemporary Readings in Sociology (pp. 118–123). Routledge.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2016). The social construction of reality. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 110–122). Routledge.
Copleston, F. C. (1966). A history of philosophy: Bentham to Russell. Paulist Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Les.
Derrida, J. (2007). Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.” 1967. Writing and Difference, 278–293.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity youth and crisis (Vol. 7). WW Norton & Company.
Foucault, M., & Deleuze, G. (1977). Intellectuals and power. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, 205, 209.
Frankl, V. (1996). Man's Search for Meaning/Viktor Frankl. Moscow: Progress.
Freud, S. (1900) The interpretation of dreams Sigmund Freud.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City.
Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought, trans. Albert Hofstadter, New York, NY: Perennial, 179.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (2011). The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception. Cultural Theory: An Anthology, 40–52.
Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature.
Husserl, E., & Moran, D. (2012). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Routledge.
Jung, C. G [Carl G.] (1959). The shadow. Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self, 9(Part 2), 8–10.
Jung, C. G [Carl G.]. (2021). Man has two souls. Mosadegh.
Jung, C. G [Carl Gustav]. (1959). Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Lacan, J. (1977). Jacques Lacan. Los Cuatro Conceptos Fundamentales Del Psicoanálisis. Seminario XI. Barcelona: Barral.
Löw, M. (2006). The social construction of space and gender. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(2), 119–133.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). Preface to motivation theory. Psychosomatic Medicine, 5(1), 85–92.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004a). Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Basic Writings. Psychology Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004b). The visible and the invisible: The intertwining-the chiasm. Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Basic Writings, 130–155.
Miller, F. D. (1984). Aristotle on rationality in action. The Review of Metaphysics, 499–520.
Moore, D. S., & Johnson, S. P. (2008). Mental rotation in human infants: A sex difference. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1063–1066.
Motahari, M. (1988). The problem of recognition. Sadra Publication.
Pallasmaa, J. (1996). The geometry of feeling: A look at the phenomenology of architecture. In Theorizing a new agenda for architecture, an anthology of architectural theory (pp. 447–453). Princeton Architectural Press.
Pallasmaa, J., Borch, C., & Eliasson, O. (2017). Architectural atmospheres: On the Experience and of Architecture (M. Nikfetrat, Trans.).
Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. Dover Publications.
Persson, A. (2018). Framing social interaction: Continuities and cracks in Goffman’s Frame Analysis. Taylor & Francis.
Plato. (2001). Republic (M. H. Lotfi, Trans.). Tehran Univercity.
Richards, I. A. (1966). Plato's Republic. CUP Archive.
Sartre, J.‑P. (2001). Jean-Paul Sartre: Basic Writings. Psychology Press.
Sartre, J.‑P., & Mairet, P. (1965). Existentialism and humanism. Methuen London.
Sheehan, K. H., & Sheehan, D. V. (2008). Assessing treatment effects in clinical trials with the discan metric of the Sheehan Disability Scale. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 23(2), 70–83.
Sonesson, G. (2019). The evolution of thinking. Cognitive semiotics in between deep history and the history of mentalities. Cognitive History. De Gruyter, Berlin, 35–74.
Sonesson, G., & Dunér, D. (2016). The cognitive semiotics of cultural evolution. In Human Lifeworlds: The Cognitive Semiotics of Cultural Evolution (pp. 7–21). Peter Lang Publishing Group.
Spanos, A. (2007). Curve fitting, the reliability of inductive inference, and the error-statistical approach. Philosophy of Science, 74(5), 1046–1066.
Suhravardi, S. (2020). Suhrawardi's Illuminationist Philosophy (y. yasrebi, Trans.). Elm Publications.
Tulayi, N. (2008). The form of a coherent city. Amirkabir.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard up.
Wang, J. (2019). Structure and measurement indicator system of social mentality. Social Mentality in Contemporary China, 49–61.
Yang, Y. (2019). Formation Mechanism and Psychological Effect of Social Mentality. Social Mentality in Contemporary China, 31–47.
Zaretsky, R. D. (1432). Albert Camus: Elements of a life. Cornell University Press.