Urban Design Discourse a Review of Contemporary Litreatures and Theories
Subject: Letter to the Editor and Publication Ethics Statement To the Editor-in-Chief, I, [Name of the corresponding author], the author responsible for the manuscript titled “[Article Title],” hereby certify and undertake the following: This manuscript has not been published previously in any journal, either domestic or international. For the purpose of review and potential publication, it has been submitted to the Journal of Urban Design Discourse as a literature review and theoretical overview of contemporary literature. Until the manuscript has undergone full review and peer assessment and a final decision has been issued by the journal, it will not be submitted to any other journal. In the course of conducting this research and preparing the manuscript, all applicable national laws and the professional ethical standards related to the research topic have been observed, including respect for the rights of participants, organizations, and institutions, as well as the rights of authors and contributors. This manuscript has been prepared and written as a result of the research activities of myself and the co-authors listed below, in the order indicated, and the rights of all individuals who have contributed to this work in any capacity have been respected. Name and Surname of the Corresponding Author — Date — Signature Names and Signatures of Other Authors (in the order they appear in the manuscript): First Author — Date — Signature Second Author — Date — Signature Third Author — Date — Signature Additional Authors — Date — Signature

Reviewing Historical cemetery: A Phenomenological Approach to the Lived Experiences of vistors - A Case Study of Wadi al-Salam cemetery in Qom

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

Hassan Darabi 1
Erfan Khodaparast 2
Fatemh Eshaghi 2
Homa Irani Behbahani 3

1 Department of Environmental design,School of Environment,College of Engineering,University of Tehran

2 MSc in Environmental Design, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran

3 Dept. Environmental Design, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran

Abstract
Aims: This research deals with the delicacies and complexities of recreating the historical cemeteries of cities. In this regard, it tries to know the obvious, hidden dimensions, layers and components in the deep levels of perception by reviewing lived experiences.

Methods: This research is qualitative and has a phenomenological approach. In this way, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted in Kusenbach's innovative method and in five axes, and also supplementary questionnaires were distributed to record, receive and analyze the meanings of the lived experiences of the landscape visitors.

Findings: The lived experiences of historical landscape cemeteries were studied in five axes: "Reference, ideal image, activity, improvement and mental dimensions" and showed that historical cemeteries have multidimensional qualities and a great variety, multiplicity and complexity in the perceptual layers.

Conclusion: If the role of the cemetery is reduced to the necessary urban infrastructure and becomes only a place for burying the bodies, then the connection between the world of the living and the dead is cut off, and turning it into a landfill for urban waste outside the city. Because of having valuable structures and elements, originality and hidden values that show the interaction of culture and nature over time, and these values preserve the identity and collective memories and historical memory of society, the protection of the historical landscape is very sensitive. Therefore, it is impossible to re-read these features in the re-creation of the cemetery without analyzing the deep perceptual layers hidden in the soul of this place.

Keywords

re-creation
historical landscape
Identity
Hermeneutics
graveyard

Subjects

[1] Quinton, J.M., Östberg, J. and Duinker, P.N., 2020. The influence of cemetery governance on tree management in urban cemeteries: A case study of Halifax, Canada and Malmö, Sweden. Landscape and Urban Planning, 194, p.103699.
[2] Quinton, J.M., Duinker, P.N., Gallant, K.A., Steenberg, J.W. and Charles, J.D., 2019. To tree or not to tree: User and management perspectives of cemetery trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 43, p.126385.
[3] Quinton, J. M., & Duinker, P. N. (2019). Beyond burial: researching and managing cemeteries as urban green spaces, with examples from Canada. Environmental reviews, 27(2), 252-262.‏
[4] Evensen, K. H., Nordh, H., & Skår, M. (2017). Everyday use of urban cemeteries: A Norwegian case study. Landscape and urban planning, 159, 76-84.‏
[5] Nordh, H., & Evensen, K. H. (2018). Qualities and functions ascribed to urban cemeteries across the capital cities of Scandinavia. Urban forestry & urban greening, 33, 80-91.‏
[6] Lai, K. Y., Sarkar, C., Sun, Z., & Scott, I. (2020). Are greenspace attributes associated with perceived restorativeness? A comparative study of urban cemeteries and parks in Edinburgh, Scotland. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 53, 126720.‏
[7] Rae, R. A. (2021). Cemeteries as public urban green space: Management, funding and form. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 61, 127078.‏
[8] خمر، غ.، پاسبان عیسی لو، و. آرامستان های درون شهری، هویت و قابلیت های فراموش شده آن، اولین کنگره بین المللی زمین، فضا و انرژی پاک، اردبیل، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، 1394.
[9] صیرفیان پور، م.، دلویی حیدری، م.، علوی، ر. به دنبال بهشت گمشده بازتعریف آرامستان در عرصه شهری امروز بر اساس الگوی باغ ایرانی، اولین کنگره بین المللی پژوهشهای علوم میان رشته ای در شهرسازی و معماری، تبریز، شرکت کیان طرح دانش، 1396.
[10] وحیدزادگان، ف. طراحی محیط و منظر آرامستان تخت فولاد اصفهان بر اساس الگوی باغ ایرانی، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد طراحی محیط زیست، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، 1391.
[11] Grabalov, P., & Nordh, H. (2021). The future of urban cemeteries as public spaces: Insights from Oslo and Copenhagen. Planning Theory & Practice, 1-18.‏
[12] دانش، ف.، فرشچی، ح. بهسازی کیفیت کالبدی و فضایی آرامستان ها با تکیه بر اصول منظرسازی (نمونه موردی: آرامستان دارالسلام کاشان)، پنجمین کنفرانس بین المللی تحقیقات نوین پژوهشی در مهندسی و تکنولوژی، شیراز، شرکت پندار اندیش رهپو، 1396.
[13] سلامی عراقی، م.، ملک افضلی، ع. طراحی فضای آرامستان با تطبیق دیدگاه مرگ آگاهی اسلامی و اگزیستانسیالیستی، کنفرانس بین المللی هنر، معماری و کاربردها، تهران، موسسه مهد پژوهش ره پویان حقیقت -پژوهشکده فرهنگ، هنر و معماری جهاد دانشگاهی-موسسه آموزش عالی دانش پژوهان پیشرو، 1395.
[14] Tilley C. Space, place, landscape and perception: Phenomenological perspectives. A phenomenology of landscape: Places, paths and monuments. 1994:7-34.
[15] وزیری زاده، ع. سیر تحول تاریخی آرامستان های شهر تهران، فصلنامه اندیشه ایرانشهر، 1388.
[16] Albrecht J. Development, Context and Purpose of Planning. University of Illinois; 1986.
[17] Flynn, S. V., & Korcuska, J. S. (2018). Credible phenomenological research: A mixed‐methods study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 57(1), 34-50.‏7
[18] Burns, M., Bally, J., Burles, M., Holtslander, L., & Peacock, S. (2022). Constructivist Grounded Theory or Interpretive Phenomenology? Methodological Choices Within Specific Study Contexts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221077758.‏
[19] Suddick, K. M., Cross, V., Vuoskoski, P., Galvin, K. T., & Stew, G. (2020). The work of hermeneutic phenomenology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920947600.‏
[20] Dahlberg, H., & Dahlberg, K. (2020). Phenomenology of science and the art of radical questioning. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419897702.
[21] Watz, S., & Ingstad, K. (2022). Keeping calm on a busy day—an interpersonal skill home care patients desire in health workers: hermeneutical phenomenological method. BMC nursing, 21(1), 1-10.‏
[22] Kusenbach, M. (2018). Go-alongs. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection, 344-361.‏
[23] Kusenbach, M., 2003. Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), pp.455-485.
[24] INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS FOR THE PRACTICE OF ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION, 2019. George D. Gann, Tein McDonald, Bethanie Walder, James Aronson, Cara R. Nelson, Justin Jonson, James G. Hallett, Cristina Eisenberg, Manuel R. Guariguata, Junguo Liu, Fangyuan Hua, Cristian Echeverría, Emily Gonzales, Nancy Shaw, Kris Decleer, and Kingsley W. Dixon. SECOND EDITION.
[25] Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2.
[26] Seamon, D. Phenomenological Research Methods and Urban Design, 2022. The Routledge Handbook of Urban Design Research Methods, edited by Hesam Kamalipour, Patricia Aelbrecht, and Nastaran Peimani, forthcoming.‏
[27] Wells, J. C. (2021). Attachment to older or historic places: Relating what we know from the perspectives of phenomenology and neuroscience. In People-Centred Methodologies for Heritage Conservation: Exploring Emotional Attachments to Historic Urban Places (pp. 16-38). Routledge.‏
[28] Hammami & Almoosa, 2021
[29] Bailey, A., & Kingsley, J. (2022). Valuing the Benefits and Enhancing Access: Community and Allotment Gardens in Urban Melbourne, Australia. Land, 11(1), 62.‏
[30] Nordh, H., Evensen, K. H., & Skår, M. (2017). A peaceful place in the city—A qualitative study of restorative components of the cemetery. Landscape and urban planning, 167, 108-117.‏
[31] Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[32] J. Lomas, M., Ayodeji, E., Brown, P. 2021. Experiences of place attachment and mental wellbeing in the context of urban regeneration. Health & Place Volume 70, 102604.
Urban Design Discourse a Review of Contemporary Litreatures and Theories
Volume 2, Issue 4
Spring 2021
Pages 59-77

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us