از حس مکان تا خلق مکان: مطالعه‌ای بر میدان راه‌آهن تهران با تأکید بر دیدگاه شاغلین مجاور

یدالهی, سعید; لک, آزاده

doi:10.48311/udd.2026.112487.0

از حس مکان تا خلق مکان: مطالعه‌ای بر میدان راه‌آهن تهران با تأکید بر دیدگاه شاغلین مجاور

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

سعید یدالهی ¹

آزاده لک ²

¹ کارشناس‌ارشد طراحی‌شهری، گروه برنامه‌ریزی و طراحی شهری و منطقه‌ای، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

² دانشیار، گروه برنامه‌ریزی و طراحی شهری و منطقه‌ای، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

10.48311/udd.2026.112487.0

چکیده

بیان مسئله: میدان راه‌آهن تهران، یکی از مهم‌ترین مراکز حمل‌ونقل پایتخت، با قدمتی طولانی، پتانسیل بالایی برای تبدیل شدن به یک مکان سرزنده و خاطره‌انگیز را دارد. بااین‌حال، علی‌رغم تلاش‌های صورت‌گرفته برای بهسازی و ارتقای کیفیت کالبدی آن، هنوز نتوانسته است به یک مکان واقعی با حس مکان عمیق تبدیل شود.
هدف: این مقاله، با هدف بررسی حس مکان در میدان راه‌آهن تهران از دیدگاه کسبه و شاغلین مجاور، به‌دنبال پاسخ به این سوال است که از دیدگاه این گروه، مداخلات بهسازی این عرصه‌عمومی چقدر در شکل‌گیری و ارتقاء حس مکان مؤثر بوده‌است؟ و چگونه می‌توان با رویکردی مکان‌‌ساز، به خلق فضایی بهتر در این میدان دست یافت؟
روش: در راستای هدفِ تدوین‌شده، از روش تحقیق کیفی و مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته و تصویری استفاده شده‌است.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌های این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که مداخلات کالبدی در ارتقاء حس مکان اثرگذار نبوده و یا جهت برعکس داشته‌است. امری‌که در شناسایی ترجیحات محیطی کاربران نیز نمایان شد و مشخص شد که مداخلات زیبایی‌شناسی نتوانسته نیاز اصلی کاربران فضا را برطرف سازد، در واقع آن‌ها ترجیحات و نیازمندی‌های دیگری داشته‌اند.
نتیجه‌گیری: به‌عنوان ماحصل یافته‌ها، پژوهش مدل بهبودیافته‌ی خلق مکان برای ارتقای کیفیت فضایی و حس مکان در میدان راه‌آهن تهران را ارائه می‌دهد، که مؤلفه‌های سازنده‌ی آن، بر ضرورت تبعیت مداخلات شهری از «عملکردگرایی واقعی» تأکید می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

حس مکان

مکان

مکان‌سازی

عملکردگرایی واقعی

موضوعات

کیفیت فضاهای عمومی شهری

عنوان مقاله English

From Sense of Place to Place-Making: A Study of Tehran Railway Square Focusing on the Perspectives of Local Vendors and Workers

نویسندگان English

Saeid Yadollahi ¹

Azadeh Lak ²

¹ M.A. in Urban Design, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

² Associate Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده English

Introduction: Tehran Railway Square, one of the capital’s most important transportation hubs with a long history, holds great potential to become a vibrant and memorable place. However, despite efforts to renovate and improve its physical quality, it has yet to transform into a genuine place with a deep sense of place.
Objective: This article aims to examine the sense of place in Tehran Railway Square from the perspective of Vendors and local workers, seeking to answer the questions: From their viewpoint, how effective have the renovation interventions been in shaping and enhancing the sense of place? And how can a place-making approach be applied to create a better space in this square?
Methodology: To achieve this objective, a qualitative research method was used, including semi-structured and visual interviews.
Findings: The findings indicate that physical interventions have not positively impacted the sense of place, and in some cases, have had the opposite effect. This was also evident in identifying users’ environmental preferences, revealing that aesthetic interventions failed to meet the core needs of space users, who in fact had different preferences and requirements.
Conclusion: As a result of the findings, the study proposes an improved place-making model to enhance spatial quality and sense of place in Tehran Railway Square, emphasizing the necessity for urban interventions to adhere to the principles of “true functionalism”.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sense of place

Place, Place-Making

True Functionalism

1. Banerjee, “Railway station, The Image of the City, and transit-oriented development: an appraisal of the cognitive value of transit hubs,” Asian Geographer, vol. 42, pp. 1-21, 2022.

2. M. V. Acker and M. Triggianese, “The spatial impact of train stations on small and medium-sized European cities and their contemporary urban design challenges,” Journal of Urban Design, vol. 26, pp. 38-58, 2020.

3. D. Biggs, “Railway stations are the beating heart of urban regeneration,” 3 March 2017.

4. L. Bertolini and T. Spit, “The railway station as node and place,” in Cities on Rails, Routledge, 1998.

5. S. Nazarian and L. Balilan Asl, “Investigating the Physical Factors of Railway Stations Based on Principles of Environmental Psychology,” Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 11 23 (2018): 115-122.

6. R. Rezazadeh and S. Mirheidar, «Designing Mashhad Railway Square Based on Environmental Perception Principles,” Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 3 1 (2012).

7. M. Farahbakhsh and P. Hanachi, “Analyzing the Effect of Railway as Industrial Heritage in Iran,” Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 20 4 (2016): 33-44.

8. M. Carmona, C. Magalhães and L. Hammond, Public Spaces: The Management Dimension, USA & Canada: Routledge, 2008.

9. E. Relph, Place and Placelessness, Tehran: Arman Shahr, 2011.

10. Y. F. Tuan, “Space and Place,” International Society for Landscape, Place & Material Culture, pp. 128-130, 1977.

11. C. Norberg-Schulz, Architecture: Meaning and Place, Tehran: Jan-e Jahan Publications, 2003.

12. R. Cowan , Dictionary of urbanism, streetwise , 2005.

13. E. J. Cilliers and W. Timmermans, “The importance of creative participatory planning in the public placemaking,” Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, pp. 413-429, 2014.

14. A. S. Kaylene and G. G. Colin , “Making Place: Identity Construction and Community Formation through “Sense of Place” in Westland, New Zealand,” Society & Natural Resources, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 901-915, 2009.

15. S. Shamai, “Sense of place: An empirical measurement,” Geoforum volume 22, pp. 347-358, 1991.

16. M. Larice and E. Macdonald, The Urban Design Reader, London: Routledge, 2007.

17. I. L. Stefanovic, “Phenomenological Encounters with Place: Cavtat to Square One,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, pp. 31-44, 1998.

18. E. Relph, “Spirit of Place and Sense of Place in Virtual Realities,” Techne, 10(3), pp. 17-25, 2007.

19. M. Falaht, “The Concept of Sense of Place and Its Formative Factors,” Journal of Fine Arts, vol. 26, pp. 57-66, 2006.

20. M. Carmona, T. Heath, T. Oc and S. Tiesdell, Public Places-Urban Spaces, Oxford: Architectural Press, 2003.

21. D. Hummon, Community Attachment: Local Sentiment & Sense of Place, New York: Plenum, 1992.

22. J. E. Cross, “What is Sense of Plaece,” Research on Place & Space, p. 12, 2001.

23. N. daneshpayeh and F. H, “The main factors affecting the formation of a sense of place in the new urban development zones (Case Study: Region No.22 & Region No.4 of Tehran Municipality),” Motaleate Shahri, 7 25 (2018).

24. “PPS,” 1 17 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.pps.org/articles/what_is_placemaking/.

25. J. Montgomery, “Making a City: Urbanity, Vitality and Urban Design,” Urban Design, pp. 166-93, 1998.

26. S. Schlebusch, “Planning for Sustainable Communities: Evaluating Place-Making Approaches,” Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, pp. 59-72, 2015.

27. J. Gehl, Life Between Buildings: Using public space, Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press, 2003.

28. A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Tehran: Ney Publications, 2016.

29. J. M. Morse, Designing funded qualitative research, Handbook of qualitative research, 1994.

30. ”Tehran Railway Station in 2018,” Wikimedia Commons, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tehran_Railway_Station_in_2018.jpg.

31. ”Fervoja stacidomo en Teherano (Irano) 001,” Wikipedia, [Online]. Available: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fervoja_stacidomo_en_Tehrano_(Irano)_001.jpg.

32. “Przestrzen Publiczna w Miejscu Dawnych Warsztatow Kolejowych,” Sztuka Krajobrazu. [Online]. Available: https://sztuka-krajobrazu.pl/3218/artykul/przestrzen-publiczna-w-miejscu-dawnych-warsztatow-kolejowych.

33. “Square Projects in Taiwan,” ArchDaily. [Online]. Available: https://www.archdaily.com/search/projects/categories/square/country/taiwan.

34. ''King’s Cross Railway Station, London, UK - 20120726-03,'' Wikimedia Commons, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:King%27s_Cross_railway_station,_London,UK-_20120726-03.jpg.

35. "Central Railway Station Square and the Finnish National Theater in Helsinki, ca. 1900," Alamy. [Online]. Available: https://www.alamy.com/central-railway-station-square-and-the-finnish-national-theater-in-helsinki-ca-1900-image332846248.html.

36. "K Street Public Life Study," DC Office of Planning. [Online]. Available: https://planning.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/op/page_content/attachments/K%20Street%20Public%20Life%20Study_2.pdf.

37. "New Urban Squares: How to Activate the Leftover Spaces Between Buildings," Land8. [Online]. Available: https://land8.com/new-urban-squares-how-to-activate-the-leftover-spaces-between-buildings/.

38. "George Street 2020: A Public Domain Activation Strategy (Part 1)," City of Sydney, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/-/media/corporate/files/2020-07-migrated/files_g/george-street-2020-a-public-domain-activation-strategy-part1.pdf?download=true.

39. Let’s Talk Halton Hills. [Online]. Available: https://letstalkhaltonhills.ca/activeeasy/widgets/17231/photos/4363.

40. J. Lang and W. Moleski, Functionalism Revisited: Architectural Theory and Practice and the Behavioral Sciences, Routledge, 2010.

41. D. Canter, The Psychology of Place, London: Architectural Press, 1977.

42. J. Punter, “Participation in the Design of Urban Space,” Landscape Design, no. 200, pp. 24-27, 1991.

43. K. Zekavat and Y. Dehghan, “Urban Design Guidance for Public Realms to Enhance Vitality and Sense of Place,” Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, 2012.

44. K. Golkar, Creating Sustainable Place; Reflections on Urban Design Theory, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University, 2014.

45. Y. He , D. Shen, L. Peng and C. Xie , “Study on the Three-Dimensional Place Making in the Core Area of Urban Central Railway Station in the Space Narrative Context,” in International Prefabricated Building Seminar on Frontier Technology and Talent Training, 2024.

46. M. Alexander and K. Hamilton, “A ‘placeful’ station? The community role in place making and improving hedonic value at local railway stations,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, pp. 65-77, 2015.