گفتمان طراحی شهری
فصلنامه علمی (ISC)

توسعه و کاربست چارچوب تحلیلی–تلفیقی برای ارزیابی ارتباط شاخص‌های شهر ۱۵ دقیقه‌ای با مسیرهای گذار شهری پایدار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

سعیده علی‌کائی 1
آرمیتا ملجائی الحسینی 2

1 گروه طراحی شهری، دانشکده شهرسازی، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشکده شهرسازی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

10.48311/udd.2026.117331.82805
چکیده
هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف تدوین و به‌کارگیری یک چارچوب تلفیقی برای تحلیل و ارزیابی میزان تحقق شاخص‌های شهر ۱۵ دقیقه‌ای در ده شهر منتخب انجام شده است. این چارچوب شاخص‌های کلیدی شهر ۱۵ دقیقه‌ای را بر اساس مولفه‌های مفهومی اثرگذار بر چهار مسیر گذار برنامه‌ی DUT (Driving Urban Transitions) شامل حمل‌ونقل پایدار شهری، فضاهای انسان‌محور، لجستیک و خدمات هوشمند، و حکمرانی و مشارکت شهری منطبق و بازتفسیر می‌کند و بدین‌ترتیب ابزار تحلیلی برای شناسایی نقاط قوت، ضعف و اولویت‌های سیاستی فراهم می‌آورد.

روش‌ها: این مطالعه از نوع کاربردی و تحلیلی–تطبیقی است و با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی هدایت‌شده انجام می‌شود. چارچوب مفهومی پژوهش، به‌عنوان مبنای تحلیل شهرهای منتخب، امکان بررسی تطبیقی شاخص‌ها و ارتباط آن‌ها با مسیرهای گذار DUT را فراهم می‌آورد.

یافته‌ها: تحلیل تطبیقی نشان می‌دهد که تحقق شاخص‌های کلیدی شامل نزدیکی، دسترسی، تراکم، تنوع، اختلاط کاربری، سازگاری، انعطاف‌پذیری، مقیاس انسانی، اتصال، دیجیتالی‌شدن و همه‌شمولی در چهار مسیر گذار DUT با شدت و کیفیت متفاوت رخ داده است. این تفاوت‌ها به ساختار کالبدی، سیاست‌های برنامه‌ریزی، تراکم جمعیت، زیرساخت‌های حمل‌ونقل و نابرابری‌های اقتصادی و اجتماعی مرتبط است.

نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج نشان می دهند تحقق کامل مدل شهر 15 دقیقه ای مستلزم هماهنگی میان چهار حوزه کلیدی DUT و شاخص های کلیدی مرتبط با آن است و تمرکز صرف بر یک حوزه، شکاف عملکردی و نابرابری فضایی ایجاد می‌کند. چارچوب تلفیقی ارائه‌شده می‌تواند راهنمای سیاست‌گذاری محلات، ارتقای کیفیت زندگی شهری و طراحی پروژه‌های پایلوت در شهرهای مختلف باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

گذارهای شهری پایدار
شهر 15-دقیقه ای
چارچوب DUT
چارچوب تحلیلی- تلفیقی
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Developing and Applying an Analytical–Integrative Framework for Assessing the Links between 15-Minute City Indicators and Sustainable Urban Transition Pathways

نویسندگان English

Saeede Alikaei 1
armita maljaie 2
1 Department of Urban Design, Faculty of Urban Planning, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Faculty of Urban Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Objective: This study aims to develop and apply an integrated framework for analyzing and assessing the implementation of 15-minute city indicators in ten selected cities. The framework aligns and reinterprets key 15-minute city indicators based on conceptual components influencing the four transition paths of the DUT (Driving Urban Transitions) program, including sustainable urban transport, human-centered urban spaces, smart logistics and services, and governance and civic participation. In doing so, it provides an analytical tool for identifying strengths, weaknesses, and policy priorities.



Methods: The study is applied and analytical–comparative in nature and employs a directed qualitative content analysis approach. The conceptual framework serves as the basis for analyzing selected cities, enabling a comparative assessment of the indicators and their alignment with the DUT transition paths.



Findings: Comparative analysis shows that the implementation of key indicators—proximity, accessibility, density, diversity, land-use mix, adaptability, flexibility, human scale, connectivity, digitalization, and inclusivity—varies in intensity and quality across the four DUT transition paths. These differences are directly influenced by urban form, planning policies, population density, transport infrastructure, and socio-economic inequalities.



Conclusion: The results indicate that the full realization of the 15-minute city model requires coordination across the four DUT domains and their associated indicators, as focusing solely on one domain creates performance gaps and spatial inequities. The proposed integrated framework can guide neighborhood-level policymaking, enhance urban quality of life, and inform the design of pilot projects in various cities

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sustainable Urban Transitions
15-Minute City
DUT Framework
Integrated Analytical Framework
1. ABDELFATTAH, L., DEPONTE, D. & FOSSA, G. 2022a. The 15-minute city as a hybrid model for Milan. TEMA, 71-86.
2. MORENO, C., ALLAM, Z., CHABAUD, D., GALL, C. & PRATLONG, F. 2021. Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart cities, 4, 93-111.
3. MORENO, C. 2024. The 15-Minute city: a solution to saving our time and our planet, John Wiley & Sons.
4. POZOUKIDOU, G. & CHATZIYIANNAKI, Z. 2021. 15-Minute City: Decomposing the new urban planning eutopia. Sustainability, 13, 928.
5. KHAVARIAN-GARMSIR, A. R., SHARIFI, A. & SADEGHI, A. 2023b. The 15-minute city: Urban planning and design efforts toward creating sustainable neighborhoods. Cities, 132, 104101.
6. LOGAN, T., HOBBS, M., CONROW, L., REID, N., YOUNG, R. & ANDERSON, M. 2022. The x-minute city: Measuring the 10, 15, 20-minute city and an evaluation of its use for sustainable urban design. Cities, 131, 103924.
7. ALLAM, Z., NIEUWENHUIJSEN, M., CHABAUD, D. & MORENO, C. 2022b. The 15-minute city offers a new framework for sustainability, liveability, and health. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6, e181-e183.
8. ALLAM, Z., CHABAUD, D., GALL, C., PRATLONG, F. & MORENO, C. 2023. Enter the 15-minute city: revisiting the smart city concept under a proximity based planning lens. Resilient and sustainable cities. Elsevier.
9. Creese, W. L. (1992). The search for environment: The garden city before and after. Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Perry, C.A. (1929). The Neighborhood Unit: A Scheme of Arrangement for the Family Life Community. Reg. Surv. N. Y. Its Environ., 7, 2–140.
11. KHAVARIAN-GARMSIR, A. R., SHARIFI, A., HAJIAN HOSSEIN ABADI, M. & MORADI, Z. 2023a. From garden city to 15-minute city: a historical perspective and critical assessment. Land, 12, 512.
12. Duany, Andres, Plater-Zyberk, Elizabeth. (1994). The Neighborhood, the District and the Corridor. In The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community, edited by Katz, Peter, 17–21. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.
13. Duany, A.; Zyberk, E.P. (2009). The Traditional Neighborhood and Urban Sprawl. In: New Urbanism and Beyond. Designing Cities for the Future; Haas, T., Ed.; Rizoli International Publications: New York, NY, USA; pp. 64–66.
14. Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton Architectural Press.
15. Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. 
16. Downs, A. (2005). Smart growth: Why we discuss it more than we do it. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(4), 367–378. 
17. ALLAM, Z., BIBRI, S. E., CHABAUD, D. & MORENO, C. 2022a. The ‘15-Minute City’concept can shape a net-zero urban future. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, 1-5.
18. ALLAM, Z., KHAVARIAN-GARMSIR, A., LASSAUBE, U., CHABAUD, D. & MORENO, C. 2024. Mapping the implementation practices of the 15-minute city. smart Cities, 7 (4), 2094–2109.
19. ABOULNAGA, M., ASHOUR, F., ELSHARKAWY, M., LUCCHI, E., GAMAL, S., ELMARAKBY, A., HAGGAGY, S., KARAR, N., KHASHABA, N. H. & ABOUAIANA, A. 2025. Urbanization and Drivers for Dual Capital City: Assessment of Urban Planning Principles and Indicators for a ‘15-Minute City’. Land, 14, 382.
20. IQBAL, A., NAZIR, H. & QAZI, A. W. 2025. Exploring the 15-Minutes City Concept: Global Challenges and Opportunities in Diverse Urban Contexts. Urban Science, 9, 252.
21. Marquet, O.; Miralles-Guasch, C. (2014). The Use of Proximity in Barcelona. An Analysis through Daily Travel Times. Ciudades, 17, 99–120.
22. Zumelzu, A., & Barrientos-Trinanes, M. (2019). Analysis of the effects of urban form on neighborhood vitality: Five cases in Valdivia, Southern Chile. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34(3), 897–925.
23. ABBIASOV, T., HEINE, C., SABOURI, S., SALAZAR-MIRANDA, A., SANTI, P., GLAESER, E. & RATTI, C. 2024. The 15-minute city quantified using human mobility data. Nature Human Behaviour, 8, 445-455.
24. Sepe, M. (2025). Contemporary approaches to healthy and livable public spaces: proximity, flexibility, and diversification. URBAN DESIGN International, 1-15.‏
25. VALE, D. & LOPES, A. S. 2023. Accessibility inequality across Europe: a comparison of 15-minute pedestrian accessibility in cities with 100,000 or more inhabitants. NPJ Urban Sustainability, 3, 55.
26. DeLisle, J.R.; Grissom, T.V. (2013). An empirical study of the efficacy of mixed-use development: The Seattle experience. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 21(1), 25–57.
27. Bruno, M., Melo, H. P. M., Campanelli, B., & Loreto, V. (2024). A universal framework for inclusive 15-minute cities. arXiv.
28. L’HOSTIS, A., CISSE, N. A., HACHETTE, M., PAPA, E., PETITET, S., BUTTNER, B., SEISENBERGER, S., SILVA, C., TEIXEIRA, J. F. & CAO, M. 2024. Navigating the 15-minute City: First Learnings and Discussions from the Driving Urban Transitions Partnership.
29. TEIXEIRA, J. F., SILVA, C., SEISENBERGER, S., BUTTNER, B., MCCORMICK, B., PAPA, E. & CAO, M. 2024. Classifying 15-minute Cities: A review of worldwide practices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 189, 104234.
30. Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of research in nursing, 23(1), 42-55.‏
31. BARBIERI, L., D’AUTILIA, R., MARRONE, P. & MONTELLA, I. 2023. Graph representation of the 15-minute city: A comparison between Rome, London, and Paris. Sustainability, 15, 3772.
32. GONGADZE, S. & MAASSEN, A. 2023. Paris’ vision for a ‘15-Minute City’sparks a global movement. World Resources Institute. https://www. wri. org/insights/paris-15-minute-city.
33. CHRISTOFORAKI, K., D NTUA, P. & PLANNER, A. U. 2024. Towards a sustainable urban Future: The 15-minute city approach in Paris, France. Sustainable Development, Culture, Traditions Journal, https://sdct-journal. com/index. php/2015-10-18-22-23-19, 2.
34. GRAELLS-GARRIDO, E., SERRA-BURRIEL, F., ROWE, F., CUCCHIETTI, F. M. & REYES, P. 2021. A city of cities: Measuring how 15-minutes urban accessibility shapes human mobility in Barcelona. PloS one, 16, e0250080.
35. FERRER-ORTIZ, C., MARQUET, O., MOJICA, L. & VICH, G. 2022. Barcelona under the 15-minute city lens: Mapping the accessibility and proximity potential based on pedestrian travel times. Smart Cities, 5, 146-161.
36. ALBERTI, F. & RADICCHI, A. 2022. The Proximity City: A Comparative Analysis between Paris, Barcelona and Milan. TECHNE-Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 69-77.
37. GAGLIONE, F., GARGIULO, C., ZUCARO, F. & COTTRILL, C. 2021. 15-minute neighbourhood accessibility: A comparison between Naples and London. Eur. Transp, 85.
38. LU, M. & DIAB, E. 2023. Understanding the determinants of x-minute city policies: A review of the North American and Australian cities’ planning documents. Journal of Urban Mobility, 3, 100040.
39. Ramírez-Saiz, A., Baquero Larriva, M. T., Lamiquiz Dauden, F. J., & Higueras García, E. (2025). Proximity planning for healthier cities: lessons from Barcelona, Bergamo, Ottawa, and Portland. Cities & Health, 9(3), 532-554.‏
40. RAO, F., KONG, Y., NG, K. H., XIE, Q. & ZHU, Y. 2024. Unravelling the spatial arrangement of the 15-minute city: A comparative study of Shanghai, Melbourne, and Portland. Planning Theory & Practice, 25, 184-206.
41. WU, H., WANG, L., ZHANG, Z. & GAO, J. 2021. Analysis and optimization of 15-minute community life circle based on supply and demand matching: A case study of Shanghai. PloS one, 16, e0256904.
42. AKRAMI, M., SLIWA, M. W. & RYNNING, M. K. 2024. Walk further and access more! Exploring the 15-minute city concept in Oslo, Norway. Journal of Urban Mobility, 5, 100077.
43. CHAU, H.-W., GILZEAN, I., JAMEI, E., LESLEY, P., PREECE, T. & QUIRKE, M. 2022. Comparative analysis of 20-minute neighbourhood policies and practices in Melbourne and Scotland. Urban Planning, 7, 13-24.
44. PEMBERTON, S., SAGHAPOUR, T., GILES-CORTI, B., ABDOLLAHYAR, M., BOTH, A., PEARSON, D., HIGGS, C., SINGH, D., GUNN, L. & WOODCOCK, J. 2024. Modelling the Infrastructure and Accessibility Implications of Implementing the 20-Minute Neighbourhood Policy in Established Areas: A Case Study of Melbourne, Australia. Dhirendra and Gunn, Lucy and Woodcock, James and Zapata-Diomedi, Belen, Modelling the Infrastructure and Accessibility Implications of Implementing the.
45. ABDELFATTAH, L., DEPONTE, D. & FOSSA, G. 2022b. The 15-minute city: interpreting the model to bring out urban resiliencies. Transportation research procedia, 60, 330-337.
46. PINTO, F. & AKHAVAN, M. 2022. Scenarios for a Post-Pandemic City: urban planning strategies and challenges of making “Milan 15-minutes city”. Transportation research procedia, 60, 370-377.
47. BRANCO DA SILVA, J., RICARDO DA COSTA, A. & MORAIS DE Sá, A. 2025. The 15-Minute City: Application to Two Parishes of the City of Lisbon. Sustainability, 17, 1461.
48. NORTE, M. P. B. P. 2022. Accessibility within 15 minutes-Development of an evaluation model for Lisbon. Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (Portugal).
49. SIMON, C. 2022. Portland’s 20-Minute Neighborhoods after Ten Years: How a Planning Initiative Impacted Accessibility, University of Washington.
50. JIN, T., WANG, K., XIN, Y., SHI, J., HONG, Y. & WITLOX, F. 2024. Is a 15-minute city within reach? Measuring multimodal accessibility and carbon footprint in 12 major American cities. Land Use Policy, 142, 107180.

  • تاریخ دریافت 10 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 18 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 17 دی 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 17 دی 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 فروردین 1405

صفحه اصلی

راهنمای نویسندگان

ارسال مقاله

داوران

تماس با ما