فصلنامه علمی (ISC)

بازاندیشی منظر شهری در پرتو شناخت‌شناسی مفاهیم ژیل کلمان: الگویی برای طراحی پایدار

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

گروه مهندسی طراحی محیط زیست، دانشکده محیط زیست، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
جهان معاصر با بحران‌های زیست‌محیطی، گسست‌های فرهنگی و چالش‌های شهرنشینی روبه‌رو است، از این‌رو بازاندیشی در طراحی منظر شهری به ضرورتی فلسفی، اخلاقی و عملی بدل شده است. رویکردهای سنتی طراحی منظر که عمدتاً بر کنترل و سلطه بر طبیعت استوارند، قادر به مواجهه با این تحولات نیستند. این پژوهش نقش مفاهیم کلیدی ژیل کلمان، از جمله «باغ در حرکت»، «باغ سیاره‌ای» و «منظر سوم» را در جهت‌گیری به سمت طراحی منظر شهری پایدار تحلیل می‌کند. مطالعه حاضر از روش تحقیق کیفی به همراه رویکردهای شناخت‌شناختی، تفسیری و نشانه‌شناسانه استفاده می‌کند. داده‌ها از طریق تحلیل محتوای آثار و نقاشی‌های کلمان، بررسی تاریخی تحولات منظر در فرانسه و تحلیل پروژه‌های اجراشده، شامل پارک آندره سیتروئن، باغ موزه‌ی کوی برانلی، پایگاه زیردریایی سن‌نازر و جزیره دربورانس جمع‌آوری شدند. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهند که منظر در دیدگاه کلمان، فرایندی زنده و پویا است که بر هم‌زیستی انسان و طبیعت، پویایی اکولوژیکی و خلاقیت بازآفرینی فضاهای رهاشده تأکید دارد. درک این مفاهیم می‌تواند مبنای نظری و عملی برای طراحی منظر شهری پایدار باشد و همزمان پاسخگوی نیازهای عملکردی و ارزش‌های فرهنگی، زیبایی‌شناختی و اخلاقی باشد. شناخت‌شناسی مفاهیم کلمان می‌تواند در مواجهه با بحران‌های زیست‌محیطی معاصر به‌عنوان الگویی الهام‌بخش برای طراحی منظر شهری عمل کند .الگویی که با باززنده‌سازی زمین‌های رهاشده، تقویت زیرساخت‌های سبز، ارتقای آگاهی و مسئولیت‌پذیری اکولوژیکی، افق‌های نوینی برای برنامه‌ریزی شهری پایدار می‌گشاید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Rethinking Urban Landscape in Light of the Epistemology of Gilles Clement’s Concepts: A Model for Sustainable Design

نویسندگان English

Fereshteh Rahdar
Homa Irani Behbahani
Hassan Darabi
Department of Environmental Design Engineering, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

The contemporary world struggles with environmental crises and cultural breakups, as well as urbanization polemics; therefore, a rethinking of the design of urban landscapes emerges as a philosophical, ethical, and practical necessity. Traditional landscape design approaches, which are largely based on the control and domination of nature, are not capable of solving these transformations. This research analyzes the role of key concepts by Gilles Clément, such as the "Garden in Motion ", the "Planetary Garden" and the "Third Landscape", in the direction toward sustainable urban landscape design. The present study employs qualitative research methods together with epistemological, interpretive, and semiotic approaches. Data was acquired using content analysis of Gilles Clément's works and paintings, historical reviews of the development of landscape in France, and analyses of implemented projects, such as Parc André Citroën, Musée du Quai Branly Garden, Saint-Nazaire Submarine Base and Derborence Island. The results show that, in Clément’s view, the landscape is considered a living and dynamic process that emphasizes human-nature cohabitation, ecological dynamism, and the regenerative creativity of abandoned places. The appreciation of these concepts could offer a theoretical and practical foundation for sustainable design of urban landscapes while simultaneously addressing functional requirements as well as cultural, aesthetic, and ethical values. The epistemology of Clément's concepts can serve as an inspiring model for urban landscape design in the face of contemporary environmental crises a model that, by revitalizing abandoned lands, strengthening green infrastructure and enhancing ecological awareness and responsibility, opens new horizons for sustainable urban planning.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Garden in Motion
Planetary Garden
Third Landscape
Landscape Design
Sustainability
Jackson, J. B. (1984). Discovering the vernacular landscape. Yale University Press.
2. Mumford, L. (1961). The city in history: Its origins, its transformations, and its prospects (Vol. 67). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
3. Jordan, D. P. (2004). Haussmann and Haussmannisation: the legacy for Paris. French Historical Studies, 27(1), 87-113.
4. Jordan, D. P. (1995). Transforming Paris: The Life and Labors of Baron Haussman. Simon and Schuster.
5. Rossi, A. (1984). The architecture of the city. MIT Press
6. Irani Behbahani, H. (2013). Architecture, garden, and landscape: Continuity, discontinuity, and innovation from the Renaissance to the twentieth-century rationalist movement. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
7. Howard, E., Osborn, F. J., & Mumford, L. (2013). Garden cities of to-morrow. Routledge
8. Adlard, M. C. (2001). The garden as a metaphor for paradise [Master’s thesis]. Grahamstown (South Africa): Rhodes University.
9. Alemi, M. (1997). The royal gardens of the Safavid period: Types and models. In Gardens in the Time of the Great Muslim Empires (pp. 72–96). Brill.
10. Walcher, H. A. (1998). Between paradise and political capital: The semiotics of Safavid Isfahan. Middle Eastern Natural Environment, 1, 330.
11. Assunto, R. (2018). Ontologia e teleologia del giardino
12. Assunto, R. (1973). Il paesaggio e l’estetica (Vol. 1). Napoli: Giannini.
13. Reker, M. M. (2022). A Filosofia do jardim em Rosario Assunto (Doctoral dissertation). Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal).
14. Villa, R. M. (2020). Imaginal. In Architecture and Naturing Affairs (Vol. 15, pp. 145–145). Birkhäuser.
15. Shariat, A. (1991). Henry Corbin and the imaginal: A look at the concept and function of the creative imagination in Iranian philosophy. Diogenes, 39(156), 83–114.
16. Montero, M. I., & Marx, R. B. (2001). Roberto Burle Marx: The lyrical landscape. University of California Press.
17. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)
18. Sartre, J. P., Richmond, S., & Moran, R. (2022). Being and nothingness: An essay in phenomenological ontology. Routledge.
19. Webber, J. (2020). Being and nothingness: An essay in phenomenological ontology, by Jean-Paul Sartre, translated by Sarah Richmond.
20. Irani Behbahani, H., & Nikkhah, M. J. (2024). The idea of landscape from modernity to the present. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
21. McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with nature. New York: American Museum of Natural History.
22. Lassus, B. (1998). The landscape approaches. University of Pennsylvania Press.
23. Capone, P. (2013). The landscape theory by Bernard Lassus: an Italian example. Ornamental Horticulture, 19(1), 63–66. 6 Owens, S. E. (1986). Energy, planning and urban form. (No Title).
24. Simon, J. (1986). Compact sets in the space L p (O, T; B). Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, 146, 65–96.
25. Owens, S. E. (1986). Energy, planning and urban form. (No Title).
26. Hertzberger, H. (2005). Lessons for students in architecture (Vol. 1). 010 Publishers.
27. Weilacher, U. (2009). Learning from Duisburg Nord. Topos—The International Review of Landscape Architecture and Urban Design, 69, 94–97.
28. Kwon, J. W. (2018). A Study on Gilles Clement’s Garden View and the ‘Garden in motion’—Centering on Conceptual Comparison with William Robinson’s Wild Garden. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture, 36(2), 46–53.
29. Coen, L. (2009). Portrait Gilles Clément. In ’scape (pp. 46–61). Birkhäuser Basel.
30. Barthes, R. (1985). Rhetoric of the Image. Semiotics: An introductory anthology, 192-205.
31. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plux (Vol. 4). Paris: éd. de Minuit.
32. Clément, G. (2015). The Planetary Garden and Other Writings (S. Morris, Trans.). University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812291384
33. Rocca, A. (2007). Planetary Gardens, The Landscape Architecture of Gilles Clément. Birkhäuser.
34. Lausanne Jardins. (2019). Gilles Clément: Toujours la vie invente [Exhibition]. Retrieved August 2, 2025, from https://2019.lausannejardins.ch/en/events/expo-gilles-clement/
35. C4R. (n.d.). La Vallée Jardin Gilles Clément. Retrieved August 4, 2025, from https://c4r.info/en/ecosystem/la-vallee-jardin-gilles-clement
36. Robinson, W., & Nelson, E. C. (2009). The wild garden. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
37. Robinson, W. (1870). The wild garden. London: John Murray.
38. Donadieu, P., & Périgord, M. (2005). Clés pour le paysage. Editions OPHRYS
39. Foucault, M., & Miskowiec, J. (1986). Of other spaces. diacritics, 16(1), 22–27.
40. Clément, G. (2013). Dossier de presse «Toujours la vie invente». Carte blanche à Gilles Clément. Exposition au Prieuré de Saint-Benoît-du-Sault, du 9 juillet au 29 septembre 2013. Graines de Récits. “Jardins de résistance.” Retrieved April 9, 2025, from https://larbredesimaginaires.fr/fruits/jardins-de-resistance
41. Viguier. (n.d.). Parc André-Citroën, Paris: A park in perfect harmony with its environment. Retrieved August 4, 2025, from https://viguier.com/en/projet/parc-andre-citroen-paris/
42. France-Voyage. (n.d.). André Citroën Park – Tourism & Holiday Guide. Retrieved August 4, 2025, from https://www.france-voyage.com/tourism/andre-citroen-park-2484.htm
43. Corner, J. (1999). Recovering landscape: Essays in contemporary landscape theory. Princeton Architectural Press.
44. Krauss, R. (1979). Sculpture in the expanded field. October, 8, 31–44.
45. Jones, L. (2006). Gilles Clément revisited: biology, art and ecology. A reply to Danielle Dagenais. Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes, 26(3), 249–252
46. Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new synthesis of mind and matter (Vol. 132). London: HarperCollins.
47. Clément, G. (2021). La sabiduría del jardinero. Editorial GG
48. Clement, G. (2004). Manifesto of the Third Landscape. International Journal of Landscape Architecture and Urban Design.
49. Shelton, A. A. (2009). The public sphere as wilderness: Le Musée du quai Branly. Museum Anthropology, 32(1), 1–16.
50. Jolly, M. (2011). Becoming a “New” Museum? Contesting Oceanic Visions at Musée du Quai Branly. The Contemporary Pacific, 23(1), 108–139.
51. Pariste.Net. (2014, August 8). Quai Branly Museum – Musée du Quai Branly – Jacques Chirac. Retrieved June 2, 2025, from https://www.pariste.net/en/musee-du-quai-branly/
52. Archiobjects. (2024, September 4). Musée du Quai Branly in Paris, Jean Nouvel. Retrieved August 4, 2025, from https://www.archiobjects.org/musee-du-quai-branly-in-paris-jean-nouvel/
53. Spinelli, P. (2014). Le Tiers paysage à l’épreuve du jardin de Saint-Nazaire: Les enjeux biologiques, territoriaux et sociétaux d’une mise en pratique du manifeste de Gilles Clément.
54. Lecardane, R., & Tesoriere, Z. (2011). Bunker culturel: la régénération du patrimoine militaire urbain à Saint-Nazaire. In Situ. Revue des patrimoines, (16).
55. Coloco. (2025). Jardins du Tiers-Paysage – Saint-Nazaire. Retrieved August 2, 2025, from https://www.coloco.org/projets/jardins-du-tiers-paysage/
56. Clément, G. (n.d.). Le Jardin du TiersPaysage [Œuvre, base sous-marine de SaintNazaire]. Estuaire. Retrieved August 24, 2025, from https://www.estuaire.info/fr/oeuvre/le-jardin-du-tiers-paysage-gilles-clement/
57. Coen, L. (2018). Chapitre 4. Glissements progressifs. In Jardins en politique (pp. 37–41). Paris: Hermann.
58. Kimic, K. (2008). Park ekologiczny–próba rewitalizacji terenów zdegradowanych na skutek działalności człowieka. In Kozłowska S., Koziarska L. (Eds.), Polskie ogrody ekologiczne. Materiały konferencyjne (pp. 25–29). Warszawa: LO
59. Kimic, K. (2012). Priorytety przyrodnicze i społeczne w rewitalizacji terenów poprzemysłowych kompleksu Emscher Landschaftspark w Niemczech. Architektura Krajobrazu, 1, 79–85.
60. Pixabay. (2018). Lands hafts park Duisburg Nord Industrial Industry Abandoned Architecture [Photograph]. Retrieved August 4, 2025, from https://pixabay.com/photos/landschaftspark-duisburg-nord-3463279/
61. Landschaftspark DuisburgNord. (n.d.). Play areas – Leisure Activities [Photograph by Thomas Berns]. Retrieved August 4, 2025, from https://www.landschaftspark.de/en/leisure-activities/play-areas/
62. Latz, P. (2022). Rust Red: The Landscape Park Duisburg Nord. Hirmer Verlag.
63. Latkowska, M. J. (2014). Post-industrial parks–places of protection and revitalisation of industrial areas. Czasopismo Techniczne
64. Meyer, E. K. (2008). Sustaining beauty. The performance of appearance: A manifesto in three parts. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 3(1), 6–23.
65. Clément, G., & Rahm, P. (2006). Environ(ne)ment: Approaches for Tomorrow (G. Borasi, Ed.). Skira Publishers.
66. Millington, N. (2015). From urban scar to ‘park in the sky’: Terrain vague, urban design, and the remaking of New York City’s High Line Park. Environment and Planning A, 47(11), 2324–2338
67. David, J., & Hammond, R. (2011). High Line: The inside story of New York City’s Park in the sky. FSG Originals.
68. Rosenfield, K. (2014, September 23). Take a walk on the High Line with Iwan Baan. ArchDaily. Retrieved August 4, 2025, from https://www.archdaily.com/550810/take-a-walk-on-the-high-line-with-iwan-baan
69. PANŢU, I. (2006). Garden in motion theory and its application in the Herăstrău Park. Scientifical Papers.
70. Keravel, S. (2008). La participation du public au projet de paysage. Comparaison et analyse de deux exemples: le parc de Lancy et le parc Henri-Matisse. Projets de paysage. Revue scientifique sur la conception et l’aménagement de l’espace, (1).
71. Metta, A., & Olivetti, M. L. (2021). Cities facing the wild. In Urban Services to Ecosystems: Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale (pp. 475–490). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
72. Lorusso, S., Scioscia, M., Sassano, G., Graziadei, A., Passannante, P., Bellarosa, S., ... & Murgante, B. (2014, June). Involving citizens in public space regeneration: The experience of “garden in motion”. In International Conference on Computational Science and its Applications (pp. 723–737). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 08 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 15 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 25 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 25 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 فروردین 1405