گفتمان طراحی شهری
فصلنامه علمی (ISC)

تببین رویکردی جامع در انطباق شهری کاربری های آموزشی با هدف بهبود کیفیت زیست پذیری محله نمونه موردی: محله بهارستان شاهرود

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

اسلام کرمی 1
مجید قلیان اول 2

1 استادیار گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشکده مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران.

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی شهرسازی، گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشکده مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران.

https://doi.org/10.48311/udd.2026.118815.82818
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف ارزیابی زیست‌پذیری محله بهارستان شهر شاهرود از طریق برنامه‌ریزی کاربری اراضی شهری و تمرکز بر کاربری‌های آموزشی انجام شد. روش تحقیق توصیفی-تحلیلی با رویکرد ترکیبی بود و معیارهای ارزیابی (مکان‌یابی، اولویت سازگاری، نوع ارتباط، کمی، اجتماعی، زیست‌محیطی، کالبدی و کیفی) از ادبیات و منابع تخصصی استخراج گردید. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار GIS (تحلیل دسترسی، شعاع خدماتی و سرانه)، مشاهده میدانی و چک‌لیست‌ها جمع‌آوری شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد شبکه آموزشی محله (۲ مهدکودک، ۳ مدرسه ابتدایی، ۱ مدرسه راهنمایی و ۱ هنرستان) دارای نقاط قوت مهمی نظیر شعاع خدماتی مناسب (۵۰۰ تا ۱۲۰۰ متر)، همجواری مطلوب با فضای سبز و بافت مسکونی، دسترسی پیاده مؤثر و عدم آلودگی محیطی است. با این حال، چالش‌های جدی شامل کمبود سرانه در مهدکودک (۱۶۲۰ مترمربع)، راهنمایی (۲۹۳۳ مترمربع) و هنرستان (۱۱۱۴ مترمربع)، تمرکز بیش از حد در محورهای پرتردد (ایجاد ترافیک شدید)، ضعف ایمنی ترافیکی، نظارت شبانه پایین، تنوع کاربری ناکافی و تباین بصری ضعیف مشاهده شد. مدارس ابتدایی با مازاد سرانه (۶۰۳۳ مترمربع) بالاترین امتیاز (۳.۸۷) و مهدکودک و هنرستان پایین‌ترین امتیاز (۳.۲۵) را کسب کردند. تحلیل SWOT نقاط قوت مانند پوشش خدماتی گسترده و همگرایی عملکردی و ضعف‌هایی نظیر ترافیک‌زایی بالا و نبود کاربری‌های فرهنگی مکمل را شناسایی کرد. نتایج تأکید دارد که مکان‌یابی و برنامه‌ریزی بهینه کاربری‌های آموزشی می‌تواند زیست‌پذیری را از طریق ارتقای عدالت فضایی، ایمنی، تعاملات اجتماعی و کیفیت محیطی بهبود بخشد. راهکارهای پیشنهادی شامل افزایش سرانه‌ها، بازتوزیع مراکز، تقویت دسترسی ایمن پیاده و دوچرخه، ارتقای هویت کالبدی و توسعه کاربری‌های مکمل فرهنگی-ورزشی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

زیست پذیری
کاربری اراضی
برنامه ریزی کاربری اراضی
شاهرود
کاربری آموزشی
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Explaining a Comprehensive Approach to Planning Educational uses with the Aim of Improving the Quality of Neighborhood Livability Case Study: Baharestan Neighborhood, Shahrood

نویسندگان English

Islam karami 1
Majid Gholianaval 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urban Planning, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.
2 Bachelor of Urban Planning Student, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Architectural and Urban Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.
چکیده English

This study assessed the livability of Baharestan neighborhood in Shahrood city, Iran, through urban land use planning, focusing on educational facilities as a case study. It adopted a descriptive-analytical method with a mixed qualitative-quantitative approach. Eight criteria—location, compatibility priority, connectivity type, quantitative, social, environmental, spatial, and qualitative—were extracted from literature and specialized sources. Data were gathered and analyzed via GIS software (for access, service radius, and per capita calculations), field observations, and checklists. The neighborhood’s educational network consists of 2 kindergartens, 3 elementary schools, 1 middle school, and 1 art school. Strengths include an appropriate service radius (500–1200 meters), suitable proximity to green spaces and residential zones, effective pedestrian access, and lack of environmental pollution. Major challenges encompass per capita deficits in kindergartens (1620 m²), middle schools (2933 m²), and art schools (1114 m²), contrasted by a surplus in elementary schools (6033 m²). Other issues involve over-concentration on busy roads leading to heavy traffic, poor traffic safety, limited nighttime surveillance, inadequate use diversity, and weak visual contrast. Elementary schools received the highest score (3.87), while kindergartens and art schools scored lowest (3.25). SWOT analysis identified strengths such as extensive service coverage and functional convergence, and weaknesses including high traffic generation and absence of complementary cultural uses. The study concludes that optimized educational planning enhances livability by advancing spatial justice, safety, social interactions, and environmental quality. Proposed solutions involve raising per capita standards, redistributing facilities, bolstering safe pedestrian and bicycle networks, improving physical identity, and adding complementary cultural and sports facilities.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Livability
land use
land use planning
Shahrood
educational use
1.    MolaeiHashjin N, akbarnejad tochahi g, mohammadi m, moradneya m. Evaluation and Study on Locating girls High school of Rasht City (The case study: The state girls high schools of Rasht/district 2). Geographical Engineering of Territory. 2019;2(3):1–16.
2.    Mohammad shafiy T, Sadroddin M, Gholamreza Janbaz G. Evaluating and locating the optimal use of higher education for sustainable development(Case Study: Azad University, Sari Branch). Journal of Geographical Engineering of Territory. 2023;6(13):661–74.
3.    Mohamadzadeh M, Azizi Z, Aghamohamadi H. Optimizing School Allocation Using Geographic Information Systems and TOPSIS Model(The Case of Tehran Area 18). Educational and Scholastic studies. 2023;12(2):677–53.
4.    Kourtit K, Nijkamp P, Türk U, Wahlstrom M. City love and place quality assessment of liveable and loveable neighbourhoods in Rotterdam. Land Use Policy. 2022;119:106109.
5.    Szibbo NA. Assessing neighborhood livability: Evidence from LEED® for neighborhood development and new urbanist communities. Articulo-Journal of Urban Research. 2016(14):1–25.
6.    Kotulla T, Denstadli JM, Oust A, Beusker E. What does it take to make the compact city liveable for wider groups? Identifying key neighbourhood and dwelling features. Sustainability. 2019;11(12):3480.
7.    Tennakoon T, Kulatunga U. Understanding liveability: Related concepts and definitions.  Proceedings of the 8th world construction symposium, Colombo Sri Lanka2019. p. 578–87.
8.    Sheikh WT, van Ameijde J. Promoting livability through urban planning: A comprehensive framework based on the “theory of human needs”. Cities. 2022;131:103972.
9.    Ahmed NO, El-Halafawy AM, Amin AM. A critical review of urban livability. European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2019;8(1):165–.
10.    Mouratidis K. Neighborhood characteristics, neighborhood satisfaction, and well-being: The links with neighborhood deprivation. Land use policy. 2020;99:104886.
11.    Nasreldin R, Fattah D, Aboubakr D. Urban Livability Dimensions in the Egyptian New Cities. Case study: Sheikh Zayed city2017.
12.    Dunstan K, editor Creating an indicator of liveability: the Neighbourhood Liveability Assessment survey (NLAS). European urban research Association (EURA) conference; 2007; Glasgow, Scotland.
13.    Tolfo G, Doucet B. Livability for whom?: Planning for livability and the gentrification of memory in Vancouver. Cities. 2022;123:103564.
14.    Rakhshaninasab H, rahdarpoodine s, solaymani m. Assessment of livability Status in the Realm of Housing (Case Study: Low-Income Neighborhoods Case City of Zabol). 2023;27.
15.    parizadi t, bigdeli l. Viability assessment in district 17 of Tehran Municipality. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards. 2016;3(1):65–90.
16.    Dadashpour H, Azizi D, Asgharzade P. Evaluating the Livable Capacity of Urban Neighborhoods in Tehran: A Case Study of Harandi, Takhti and Kosar Neighborhoods. Geography and Urban Space Development. 2017;3(2):53–68.
17.    salehi s, lotfie p. Location of educational centers by AHP method (case study: Saravabad city). Geography and Human Relationships. 2018;1(1):372–89.
18.    amanpour S, mohammadi dahchshma, Mostafa, Parvizian, Alireza. Vulnerability assessment training centers in terms of passive defense (Case Study: Primary School metropolis Ahvaz). Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies. 2018;7(27):43–60.
19.    taghavizirvani e, Nazmfar H, Mansourian H. Dimensions and indices of urban livability, case study, Sari. 2023;14(54):1–14.
20.    Rostami R, Mousavi Y, Ghadimi B, Mirzai K. Explaining the Effective Factors on Urban Livability Case Study: Ilam City. Sustainable city. 2021;4(2):107–24.
21.    hekmati ah, joodaki, hamidreza, ziari, yousef ali. Analysis of the relationship between urban livability and environmental sustainability in area 22 of Tehranmetropolis. Natural Ecosystems of Iran. 2023;13(4):39–54.
22.    Dolatshah S, Sarvar R, Tavaklan A. Assessment of Urban Liveability in Iranian Oil Cities Case Study: Bandar Mahshahr. Sustainable city. 2021;4(3):69–80.
23.    hoseinzadeh R, safaralizadeh, esmaeil, khabbazi, hosein. Assessing the Livability of Urban Neighborhoods in the Direction of Sustainable Development, from the Perspective of Citizens, Case Study: Shahre Kohne and Seyed Morteza in Kashmar City. Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies. 2022;10(40):123–40.
24.    Zeynali Azim A, Karami I. An integrated assessment of city residents' attachment and belonging to functional components of urban livability and social relations of neighbors (Case study: District 8 of Tabriz). Researches in Earth Sciences. 2023;14(3):130–48.
25.    Mohammadmehdi R, Azita B, Hasan S, Saeed M. An Analysis of Urban Livability Dimensions in Tehran: Emphasizing Sustainable Development (A Case Study of the Sirous Neighborhood). Rahbord Journal. 2023;32(107):331–56.
26.    Rezaei M, Sheikh Azami, Ali , Shariat Panahi, Majid Wali, Fallah Tabar, Nasrullah. The position of urban livability in urban planning (Study case: Khorramabad, Alshtar, Kohdasht cities in Lorestan province). Human & Environment. 2024;22(2):–.
27.    Kalantar M, Daneshvar m, Seyyedolhosseini SM, Bandarabad A. Recognizing the dimensions and components of urban livability with using Meta-Synthesis approach. Journal of Future Cities Vision. 2025;5(4):81–104.
28.    Saghebi M, mafi E, Watanparast M. Evaluation and measurement of urban viability and factors affecting it (case study of Bojnourd city). Applied Research in Geographical Sciences. 2022;22(67):335–50.
29.    derakhshanzadeh m, dadras b. Spatial Analysis and Location of Educational Centers (Secondary Schools) Using Geographic Information System (GIS) (Dehdasht city of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad). Geography and Human Relationships. 2018;1(2):1–18.
30.    ghanbari e. Assessment of the location of educational applications in Shahin Dezh with the AHP case model (Ganjavi military boys' high school and Somayeh girls high school). Geography and Human Relationships. 2018;1(3):32–43.
31.    panahi A. Reviewing and Organizing Site Selection of Elementary Learning Centers through Geographical Information System (Case Study Tabriz Municipality, Region 4). Geographical planning of space quarterly journal. 2018;8(27):21–34.
32.    namdari s. Locating Evaluation of Educational Landuse in Doroud of Lorestan Province. Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning. 2016;10(33):117–30.
33.    Ghazanfarpor H, Karbasi P, Afzali Goroh Z, Soleimani Dameneh M. Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method in the assessment of compatibility urban land (Case study: high school educational applications Maragheh. 2017;8(30):121–44.
34.    Iyanda SA, Ismail O, Fabunmi FO, Adeogun AS, Mohit MA. Evaluating neighborhoods livability in Nigeria: A structural equation modelling (SEM) approach. International Journal of built environment and sustainability. 2018;5(1):47–55.
35.    soleimani Mehrenjani M, Tavallai S, Rafieian M, Zanganeh A, khazaei Nezhad F. Urban livability: the concept, principles, aspects and parameters. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR). 2016;4(1):27–50.
36.    Roka K. Liveable City: Towards Economic, Social, Cultural, and Environmental Well-being. In: Leal Filho W, Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T, editor. Sustainable Cities and Communities. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Springer, Cham; 2019. p. 1–13.
37.    Elmahdy N, Rowaida R, Nasreldin R. Contextualizing Urban Liveability indicators to create liveable Neighbourhoods. 2021.
38.    Innocent W, Ndukueze F. Quality of Life and Livability in selected Neighborhoods in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP). 2018;8.
39.    Kovacs-Györi A, Cabrera-Barona P, Resch B, Mehaffy M, Blaschke T. Assessing and representing livability through the analysis of residential preference. Sustainability. 2019;11(18):4934.
40.    nikpour a, Yarahmadi M. Identification of factors affecting urban viability in Nourabad Mamasani. Urban Structure and Function Studies. 2020;7(23):7–27.
41.    Stimson R, Marans R. Objective measurement of QoL and quality of urban life. Investigating quality of urban life. 2011:33–54.
42.    Mulligan G, Carruthers J, Cahill M. Urban Quality of Life and Public Policy: A Survey. Contributions to Economic Analysis. 2004;266:729–802.
43.    Florida R, Mellander C, Stolarick K. Beautiful Places: The Role of Perceived Aesthetic Beauty in Community Satisfaction. Regional Studies. 2011;45:33–48.
44.    Gough MZ. Reconciling livability and sustainability: Conceptual and practical implications for planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2015;35(2):145–60.
45.    Tapsuwan S, Mathot C, Walker I, Barnett G. Preferences for sustainable, liveable and resilient neighbourhoods and homes: A case of Canberra, Australia. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2018;37:133–45.
46.    Lowe M, Whitzman C, Badland H, Davern M, Aye L, Hes D, et al. Planning Healthy, Liveable and Sustainable Cities: How Can Indicators Inform Policy? Urban Policy and Research. 2015;33:1–14.
47.    Karami I. An introduction to urban and urbanization laws and regulations. tabriz: Academic Language Publications; 2025.
48.    Firoozi PD, M.A., Rahmaani P, Hosseini Shahpariyaan N, Fereydoonnejaad M. Optimal Positioning of Middle Schools within the City of Dehdasht through a Combination of Boolean Logic and FAHP. Quarterly Journal Of Education. 2016;32(3):156–77.
49.    Pourmohammadi MR. Land use planning in urban areas. : . Tehran: Organization for Research and Compilation of Humanities Sciences Textbooks (SAMT); 2004.
50.    Organization IsMaB. Site selection and reallocation of educational spaces: Regulation No. 827. National Organization for Renovation, Development, and Equipment of Schools, Deputy TaS; 2020. Report No.: 827.
51.    Habibi SM, & Masaili, S. Per capita urban land uses. Tehran: National Land and Housing Organization, Land and Housing Studies Office.; 1999.
52.    Abedini A, Mehrabad FJ, Emami E, Bagherzadeh M, Far RI. An Evaluation of the Social Justice Indicators for Availability and Distribution of Educational Land Use in Islamic Cities (Case Study: Tabriz). Journal of Urban Space and Social Life. 2024;2(7):57–73.
گفتمان طراحی شهری
دوره 7، شماره 3
پاییز 1405
صفحه 41-62

  • تاریخ دریافت 17 دی 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 11 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 11 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 مهر 1405

صفحه اصلی

راهنمای نویسندگان

ارسال مقاله

داوران

تماس با ما