فصلنامه علمی (ISC)

پدیدارشناسی حاشیه‌نشینی و چالش عدالت در معماری شهر مشهد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مشهد. بلوار سرافرازان. سرافرازان 9 . دانشگاه اقبال لاهوری. گروه روانشناسی

2 دانشجوی دکتری هنر، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 مربی گروه هنر، موسسه آموزش عالی فردوس، مشهد، ایران

10.48311/udd.2026.117752.82810
چکیده
اهداف: این پژوهش به بررسی ابعاد اجتماعی، اقتصادی و فضایی پدیده حاشیه‌نشینی در شهر مشهد و تبیین رابطه آن با مفهوم توسعه شهری پرداخته است. زمینه شکل‌گیری تحقیق، گسترش فقر فضایی و افزایش نابرابری در کلان‌شهر مشهد است و رشد سریع سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی روبه‌رو بوده است. 
روش‌ها: روش پژوهش توصیفی–تحلیلی با رویکرد کیفی پدیدارشناسی است و داده‌ها از طریق مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختار‌یافته با چهارده نفر از ساکنان مناطق حاشیه‌ای جمع‌آوری و بر اساس روش کولایزی تحلیل شده‌اند. 
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که ساکنان این نواحی با مجموعه‌ای از مشکلات ساختاری و روانی مواجه‌اند؛ از جمله احساس ناامنی، اضطراب مزمن، طرد اجتماعی، بی‌ارزشی، خستگی و ناامیدی، اما در عین حال نوعی مقاومت درونی و امید پنهان برای تغییر در آنان مشاهده می‌شود. عوامل کلیدی تداوم فقر فضایی شامل نابرابری اقتصادی، ضعف سیاست‌گذاری شهری، تمرکز خدمات در هسته مرکزی، و فقدان مشارکت اجتماعی است. 
نتیجه‌گیری: نتیجه‌گیری پژوهش بیانگر آن است که بدون رویکردی یکپارچه در حوزه‌های مسکن، اشتغال، آموزش و توانمندسازی اجتماعی، مدیریت پایدار مناطق حاشیه‌ای ممکن نیست. راهکارهای پیشنهادی شامل توسعه محله‌محور، برنامه‌ریزی مشارکتی، بازتوزیع عادلانه منابع شهری و تقویت حس تعلق اجتماعی در میان ساکنان است. این مطالعه تأکید می‌کند که گذار از فقر فضایی به برابری شهری، مستلزم بازتعریف عدالت فضایی و مشارکت واقعی شهروندان در تصمیم‌سازی‌های شهری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The Phenomenology of Marginalization and the Challenge of Justice in the Architecture of Mashhad

نویسندگان English

Golamreza Tabrizikahou 1
Sahar Tabrizi 2
Samad Barghi 3
1 Assistant professor, Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology, University of Eqbal Lahoori, Mashhad, Iran
2 PhD Student in Art, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Music, University of Ferdows, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده English

Abstract

Aims :

This study examines the social, economic, and spatial dimensions of marginalization in the city of Mashhad and explicates its relationship with the concept of urban development. The research is motivated by the expansion of spatial poverty and rising inequalities in this metropolis, which has been accompanied by the rapid growth of informal settlements.

Methods:

The methodology employed is a descriptive-analytical approach with a qualitative phenomenological orientation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with fourteen residents of marginalized areas and analyzed using Colaizzi’s method.

Findings:

The findings reveal that residents face a combination of structural and psychological challenges, including feelings of insecurity, chronic anxiety, social exclusion, worthlessness, fatigue, and hopelessness, while simultaneously displaying an inner resilience and latent hope for change. The key factors perpetuating spatial poverty include economic inequality, weak urban policymaking, concentration of services in the central urban core, and lack of social participation.

Conclusion:

The results indicate that sustainable management of marginalized areas is unattainable without an integrated approach to housing, employment, education, and social empowerment. Suggested strategies include neighborhood-based development, participatory planning, equitable redistribution of urban resources, and strengthening residents’ sense of belonging. The study emphasizes that a transition from spatial poverty to urban equity requires redefining spatial justice and ensuring genuine citizen participation in urban decision-making processes.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Urban development
Marginalization
Informal settlements
Urban policies
  1. Ahmadi, R., Ghahremani, S., Beshrati Kivi, S., Bayat, F., Zareh, N., Rohani, A., Hamidi, R., Hamidi, N., Ghamisi, K., & Janianpour, P. (2022). Investigating Social Factors of Residential Satisfaction and the Impact on Housing Price in Spontaneous Settlements in Tehran Fringe. Open Access Library Journal, 9(10), 1-21. https://doi: 10.4236/oalib.1109176

    2. Khoshsima, F., Ahmadi, V., Farkisch, H., & Hanaee, T. (2025). 4 Assessment the Physical Components of Suburban Housing in Accordance with the Lifestyle of Immigrants. Hoviatshahr, 18(59), 5 – 18. https://doi: 10.71793/hoviatshahr.2024.795248 [Persian]  

    3. Hatami, D., Arabi, Z., & Rahmani, E. (2016). 3 Locating the optimal model of urban green space using Fuzzy Logic and AHP,By GIS. Case study: the city of Mashhad. Amayesh, 9(32), 63-84. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/ebtp/Issue/43970[Persian]  

    4. Ringrose, D. R. (1998). Capital Cities, Urbanization, and Modernization in Early Modern Europe. Journal of Urban History, 24(2), 155-183.https://doi.org/10.1177/009614429802400201

    5. Castells, M. (2010). Globalisation, Networking, Urbanisation: Reflections on the Spatial Dynamics of the Information Age. Urban Studies, 47(13), 2737-2745.https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010377365

    6. Ramezani Farokhad, A., Akbari, H., Fouladiyan, M. and Mousaaei, M. (2024). A marginal area on the body of Mashhad metropolis: A socioeconomic analysis of the formation process of the Qala-e-Khiaban Neighborhood in Mashhad. Geography and Urban Space Development, 11(1), 25-47. doi: 10.22067/jgusd.2022.72270.1098[Persian]  

    7. Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press, Albany.https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=575640

    8. Habibi, K., Arefi, M., Doostvandi, M. and Ashouri, K. (2022). Reproduction of urban informality in Iran: Its key factors, tools and challenges. Journal of Urban Management, 11(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.05.007  

    9. Aghajani, H., Razzaghian, F. and Ghazi, R. (2024). Identifying Factors Influencing the Formation and Growth of Informal Settlements in Mashhad (Case Study: Seyedi, Khajeh Rabi, Ghal’e Sakhteman, and Jaddeh Qadim Ghochan Areas). Geography and Development, 22(77), 31-54. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2024.8681[Persian]  

    10. Pilehvar, A. (2021). Spatial-geographical analysis of urbanization in Iran. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, 8(1),1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00741-w

    11. sarvar,H. and aminzadeh,S. (2019). Explaining causes of the formation of informal settlements and providing optimal solutions to organize them (Case Study: Boukan- Aliabad Neighborhood). Geography and Human Relationships, 2(3), 17-42. https://www.gahr.ir/article_99462.html[Persian]  

    12. Agyabeng, A. N., Peprah, A. A., Mensah, J. K., & Mensah, E. A. (2022). Informal settlement and urban development discourse in the Global South: Evidence from Ghana. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 76(4), 242–253.https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2022.2113428

    13. García, G.A., Badillo, E.R. & Aristizábal, J.M. (2024). Housing Informality and Labor Informality in Space: In Search of the Missing Links. Appl. Spatial Analysis, 17, 923–949.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-024-09569-8

    14. Rusdiyanto, E., & Pariyanti, E. (2025). Mapping the field of sustainable slum upgrading: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global practices. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 9(4), em0330. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/16832

    15. Lehmann, S. (2023). The unplanned city: public space and the spatial character of urban informality. Emerald Open Research, 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.1108/EOR-05-2023-0007

    16. Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.https://davidharvey.org/media/righttothecity

    17. Zhu, Y, Zhang, Y, Biljecki, F. (2025). Understanding the user perspective on urban public spaces: A systematic review and opportunities for machine learning. Cities, 156, 105535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105535

    18. Lefebvre, H. (1968). The Right to the City. Paris, Anthropos.org/library/henri-lefebvre-right-to-the-city

    19. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities (E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Eds. & Trans). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1968).  https://lefebvre-henri-writings-on-cities

    20. Fainstein, S. S. (2013). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.834643

    21. Yiftachel, O. (2009). Theoretical Notes On `Gray Cities’: The Coming of Urban Apartheid? Planning Theory, 8(1), 88-100.https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099300

    22. Roy, A. (2005). Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976689

    23. Yiftachel, O., & Yacobi, H. (2003). Urban Ethnocracy: Ethnicization and the Production of Space in an Israeli ‘Mixed City’. Environment and Planning. Society and Space, 21(6), 673-693.https://doi.org/10.1068/d47j

    24. Harvey, D. (2009). Try the new Google Books. University of Georgia Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Social_Justice_and_the_City

    25. Smith, M E. (2010). The archaeological study of neighborhoods and districts in ancient cities. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 29 (2), 137-154.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2010.01.001

    26. Andrés López, G. (2023). Recent Transformations in the Morphology of Spanish Medium-Sized Cities: From the Compact City to the Urban Area. Land, 12(7), 1276.https://doi.org/10.3390/land12071276

    27. Hartt, M & Hackworth, J. (2020). Shrinking Cities, Shrinking Households, or Both? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(6), 1083-1095.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12713 

    28. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

    29. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London, England: Macmillan Press Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2

    30. Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, LA: University of California Press.https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers? referenceid=2005050

    31. Williams, G. (2004). Evaluating Participatory Development: Tyranny, Power and (Re)Politicisation. Third World Quarterly, 25(3), 557–578.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3993825

    32. Berke, P. (2016). Twenty Years After Campbell’s Vision: Have We Achieved More Sustainable Cities? Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(4), 380–382.https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1214539

    33. Purcell, M. (2013). To Inhabit Well: Counterhegemonic Movements and the Right to the City. Urban Geography, 34(4), 560–574.https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.790638

    34. Soja, E. (2010). Spatializing the urban, Part I. City, 14(6), 629–635.https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2010.539371

     

  • تاریخ دریافت 25 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 07 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 07 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 07 بهمن 1404