Volume 1, Issue 1 (2020)                   2020, 1(1): 29-44 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- Architecture Department, Hamedan Branch, Payame Noor University, Hamedan, Iran
2- Urban Design Department, Art & Architecture Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3- Urban & Regional Planning Department, Hamedan Branch, Payame Noor University, Hamedan, Iran
Abstract:   (4811 Views)
The item of livability is one of the closest concepts to the quality of life that through it an ideal environmental society can be estimated. Therefore, any increasing or decreasing in the amount of livability is a means to evaluate staying inhabitants in the neighborhoods, regions, and cities. Also, it is a measurement for estimating the quality of life. While the city is developing, at the same time, all its traditional, new and periphery neighborhoods are facing to variety of physical, cultural, etc changes. So, due to existence of some challenging issues and necessity of livability to inhabitants, this needs to be assessed. In this study, three different neighborhoods including Haji, Etemadieh, and Mazdaghineh are investigated. It is interesting that all of them situated in 2 region municipality in Hamedan. There would be four components including physical-spatial, social-cultural, economic, and environmental items. The analytical-comparative methodology is used and in order to data analyzing and final evaluations, SPSS 19 and Expert Choice 10 technique is implemented and finally AHP method is used. To gather data observing, completion questionaires by residetial neighborhood and interviews with experts are used. Final results exhibited that the amount of livability in the neighborhood of Etemadieh is the most, nearly 0.431 points, and Haji and Mazdaghineh respectively are the second and the third livability neighborhoods with 0.322 and 0.246 points. The physical and economic components in Haji neighborhood are more favorable than other neighborhoods, but the social component in Mazdaqineh neighborhood is superior to the other two neighborhoods. The Etemadiyeh neighborhood is also a priority in the environmental component over other neighborhoods.
Full-Text [PDF 1003 kb]   (1468 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Quality of Urban Public Spaces
Received: 2019/12/14 | Accepted: 2019/12/29 | Published: 2020/03/15

References
1. Mousavi Y. Urban neighborhood regeneration based on community development planning framework. Iranian Journal of Social Studies. 2009;24(2):99-123. [Persian] [Link]
2. Kashef M. Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Front Archit Res. 2016;5(2):239-53. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.foar.2016.03.003]
3. Mir Najaf M, Zare A, Manoochehri A, Ahar H. Analysis of the effects of dispersed urban growth on the viability of urban areas, case study: Maragheh City. Urban Programme. 2018;8(31):1-18. [Persian] [Link]
4. The Economist Intelligence Unit. The Global Livability Report [Internet]. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit; 2017 [cited 2019, June 23]. Available from: https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=Liveability17 [Link]
5. Van Kamp I, Leidelmeijer K, Marsman G, De Hollander A. Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landsc Urban Plan. 2003;65(1-2):5-18. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00232-3]
6. Giap TK, Thye WW, Aw G. A new approach to measuring the liveability of cities: The global liveable cities index. World Rev Sci Technol Sustain Dev. 2014;11(2):176-96. [Link] [DOI:10.1504/WRSTSD.2014.065677]
7. Eisalu AA, Bayat M, Bahrami A. The notion of livability: A new approach in improve of quality of life in rural communities-case study: Qom County, Kahak District. J Hous Rural Environ. 2014;33(146):107-20. [Persian] [Link]
8. Alexander C. The timeless way of building. Ghaumi Bid Hendi M, translator. Tehran: Beheshti University; 2003. [Persian] [Link]
9. Polyzoides S, Moule E, Duany A, Katz P, Robertson J, Krieger A, et al. The seaside debates: A critique of the new urbanism. Bressi TW, editor. NewYork: Rizzoli International Publications; 2002. [Link]
10. livablecities.org. IMCL [Internet]. International making cities livable. [cited 2019, July 2]. Available from: http://www.livableci ties.org. [Link]
11. Ruth M, Franklin RS. Livability for all? Conceptual limits and practical implications. Appl Geogr. 2014;49:18-23. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.018]
12. Ge J, Hokao K. Research on residential lifestyles in Japanese cities from the viewpoints of residential preference, residential choice and residential satisfaction. Landsc Urban Plan. 2006;78(3):165-78. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.07.004]
13. Karimi Moshaver M, Negin Taji F, Zeraatpisheh HR. The appearance of place identity in the urban landscape by using the natural factors (a case study of Yasouj). Journal of Architecture and Urbanism. 2011;39(2):132-139. [Link] [DOI:10.3846/20297955.2015.1059778]
14. Aulia DN. A framework for exploring livable community in residential environment, case study: Public housing in Medan, Indonesia. Proced Soc Behav Sci. 2016;234:336-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.250]
15. Epley DR, Menon M. A method of assembling cross-sectional indicators into a community quality of life. Soc Indic Res. 2008;88(2):281-96. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11205-007-9190-7]
16. Sajadzadeh H, Sharifi A, Asadi MA, Sharifi N. Spatial attachment and environmental quality perception on satisfaction in traditional neighborhood (case study: Hamedan's Haji neighborhood). Res Urban Program. 2015;6(22):139-52. [Persian] [Link]
17. Zarei Haji Abadi F, Pashmakian N, Shahabi S. The evaluation of inhabitants' satisfaction in old society (case study: Hamedan's Haji neighborhood. Logistic and Environment. 2013:6(22):101-19. [Persian] [Link]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.